<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Criminal Background Checks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://datafindersusa.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://datafindersusa.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on What has the Bush administration done that is actually criminal? by johnfarber2000</title>
		<link>http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>johnfarber2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 23:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/#comment-533</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


These people have done so many bad things. If one were to make a list of them, and then analyze each one to attest that that one is a violation of law, it would be a long, long process.
I will make it my project to compile such a list and then I will email it to you as well as post it as a question.
The first one I will post is lying to congress.
It looks that some of the preceding answers did the job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>These people have done so many bad things. If one were to make a list of them, and then analyze each one to attest that that one is a violation of law, it would be a long, long process.<br />
I will make it my project to compile such a list and then I will email it to you as well as post it as a question.<br />
The first one I will post is lying to congress.<br />
It looks that some of the preceding answers did the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What has the Bush administration done that is actually criminal? by Ted M</title>
		<link>http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/#comment-532</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


nothing
neither did scooter libby, but that didn't stop the liberals from pushing for a coviction.
there is an unjust witch hunt out there --- and this is coming from someone who doesn't even like bush that much.
they should do their job and run this country instead of the mudslinging and smear tactics --- they are wasting our money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>nothing<br />
neither did scooter libby, but that didn&#8217;t stop the liberals from pushing for a coviction.<br />
there is an unjust witch hunt out there &#8212; and this is coming from someone who doesn&#8217;t even like bush that much.<br />
they should do their job and run this country instead of the mudslinging and smear tactics &#8212; they are wasting our money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What has the Bush administration done that is actually criminal? by Sugarbaby</title>
		<link>http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/comment-page-1/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Sugarbaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 06:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/#comment-531</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


i will repeat as my friend above

Bush ordered the invasion of two sovereign countries without provocation - that is a violation of international law. The deaths of thousands of Iraqi innocents as a direct result of that invasion are on his head. statistically over a million dead iraqis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>i will repeat as my friend above</p>
<p>Bush ordered the invasion of two sovereign countries without provocation - that is a violation of international law. The deaths of thousands of Iraqi innocents as a direct result of that invasion are on his head. statistically over a million dead iraqis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What has the Bush administration done that is actually criminal? by Who else?</title>
		<link>http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/comment-page-1/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>Who else?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/#comment-530</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


He violated an 1978 act limiting presidential powers. I'll look it up right now and get back to you. Okay, here it is:

The President may authorize, through the Attorney General, electronic surveillance without a court order for the period of one year provided it is only for foreign intelligence information [5]; targeting foreign powers as defined by 50 U.S.C. §1801(a)(1),(2),(3) [6] or their agents; and there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party.[7]

The Attorney General is required to make a certification of these conditions under seal to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court[8], and report on their compliance to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. [9]

Since 50 U.S.C § 1802 (a)(1)(A) of this act specifically limits warrantless surveillance to foreign powers as defined by 50 U.S.C. §1801(a) (1),(2), (3) and omits the definitions contained in 50 U.S.C. §1801(a) (4),(5),(6) the act does not authorize the use of warrantless surveillance on: groups engaged in international terrorism or activities in preparation therefore; foreign-based political organizations, not substantially composed of United States persons; or entities that are directed and controlled by a foreign government or governments. [10] Under the FISA act, anyone who engages in electronic surveillance except as authorized by statute is subject to both criminal penalties [11] and civil liabilities. [12]

[edit] With a court order

Alternatively, the government may seek a court order permitting the surveillance using the FISA court.[13] Approval of a FISA application requires the court find probable cause that the target of the surveillance be a "foreign power" or an "agent of a foreign power", and that the places at which surveillance is requested is used or will be used by that foreign power or its agent. In addition, the court must find that the proposed surveillance meet certain "minimization requirements" for information pertaining to US persons[14].

In 2003, Belgium dropped the war crimes charges against **** Cheney, but now it appears he's in trouble with the SEC - see link below.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>He violated an 1978 act limiting presidential powers. I&#8217;ll look it up right now and get back to you. Okay, here it is:</p>
<p>The President may authorize, through the Attorney General, electronic surveillance without a court order for the period of one year provided it is only for foreign intelligence information [5]; targeting foreign powers as defined by 50 U.S.C. §1801(a)(1),(2),(3) [6] or their agents; and there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party.[7]</p>
<p>The Attorney General is required to make a certification of these conditions under seal to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court[8], and report on their compliance to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. [9]</p>
<p>Since 50 U.S.C § 1802 (a)(1)(A) of this act specifically limits warrantless surveillance to foreign powers as defined by 50 U.S.C. §1801(a) (1),(2), (3) and omits the definitions contained in 50 U.S.C. §1801(a) (4),(5),(6) the act does not authorize the use of warrantless surveillance on: groups engaged in international terrorism or activities in preparation therefore; foreign-based political organizations, not substantially composed of United States persons; or entities that are directed and controlled by a foreign government or governments. [10] Under the FISA act, anyone who engages in electronic surveillance except as authorized by statute is subject to both criminal penalties [11] and civil liabilities. [12]</p>
<p>[edit] With a court order</p>
<p>Alternatively, the government may seek a court order permitting the surveillance using the FISA court.[13] Approval of a FISA application requires the court find probable cause that the target of the surveillance be a &#8220;foreign power&#8221; or an &#8220;agent of a foreign power&#8221;, and that the places at which surveillance is requested is used or will be used by that foreign power or its agent. In addition, the court must find that the proposed surveillance meet certain &#8220;minimization requirements&#8221; for information pertaining to US persons[14].</p>
<p>In 2003, Belgium dropped the war crimes charges against **** Cheney, but now it appears he&#8217;s in trouble with the SEC - see link below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What has the Bush administration done that is actually criminal? by pilot</title>
		<link>http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>pilot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/#comment-529</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


Bush ordered the invasion of two sovereign countries without provocation - that is a violation of international law.  The deaths of thousands of Iraqi innocents as a direct result of that invasion are on his head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>Bush ordered the invasion of two sovereign countries without provocation - that is a violation of international law.  The deaths of thousands of Iraqi innocents as a direct result of that invasion are on his head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What has the Bush administration done that is actually criminal? by R B</title>
		<link>http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/comment-page-1/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>R B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/#comment-528</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


You are correct,sir!This administration has been masterful in avoiding breaking specific laws.They refuse to testify under oath-therefore no possible perjury charges.(Although the other shoe may someday drop on Gonzales.)Other instances of skirting,rather than breaking the law,are rampant.I am constantly amazed at the number of people here who have absolutely zero grasp of the Constitution,but are more than willing to solve all our problems.Turn off your radio and read the Constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>You are correct,sir!This administration has been masterful in avoiding breaking specific laws.They refuse to testify under oath-therefore no possible perjury charges.(Although the other shoe may someday drop on Gonzales.)Other instances of skirting,rather than breaking the law,are rampant.I am constantly amazed at the number of people here who have absolutely zero grasp of the Constitution,but are more than willing to solve all our problems.Turn off your radio and read the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What has the Bush administration done that is actually criminal? by Dennis H</title>
		<link>http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/#comment-527</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


Their wire tapping was absolutely illegal. The supreme court even said it was. 

Their leak of Valerie Plame's identity was illegal. As was the cover up. So far only Scooter Libby has gone to prison as a result. 

The actions **** Cheney suggested in his closed door meetings with big oil executives that have led to market manipulations and price gouging were almost certainly illegal. 

Lying to start a war against a soveriegn nation is illegal under international law. 

And those are just the things I know about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>Their wire tapping was absolutely illegal. The supreme court even said it was. </p>
<p>Their leak of Valerie Plame&#8217;s identity was illegal. As was the cover up. So far only Scooter Libby has gone to prison as a result. </p>
<p>The actions **** Cheney suggested in his closed door meetings with big oil executives that have led to market manipulations and price gouging were almost certainly illegal. </p>
<p>Lying to start a war against a soveriegn nation is illegal under international law. </p>
<p>And those are just the things I know about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What has the Bush administration done that is actually criminal? by DCCIII</title>
		<link>http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/comment-page-1/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>DCCIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/#comment-526</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


More Bush Criminal Activity
" &gt;TomPaine.com - Criminal Administration" &gt;Jailing the Messenger" &gt;House Judiciary Committee Report Unveils a String of Criminal Activity ..." &gt;More Bush Criminal Activity</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>More Bush Criminal Activity<br />
&#8221; >TomPaine.com - Criminal Administration&#8221; >Jailing the Messenger&#8221; >House Judiciary Committee Report Unveils a String of Criminal Activity &#8230;&#8221; >More Bush Criminal Activity</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What has the Bush administration done that is actually criminal? by friendlyflyr</title>
		<link>http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>friendlyflyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/#comment-525</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


I dislike Bush and Cheney even more ... But let us be honest for a minute.

Since the U.S. Patriot Act was signed into law the Bush administration has done nothing that was illegal that anyone is aware of or something would already be being done about it by the Democrats, just like everything the Democrats are doing is legal or the Republicans would be all over it - not just radio entertainers from both big top tents.

They may have twisted, miscommunicated, only showed half the information, only released what they wished people to believe, refused to cooperate in a bipartisan manner, not done some things in a proper manner and possibly even been flat out ****** to anyone not in their little group but, they have not broken any law since the Patriot Act was signed.

*Unless it is meant 'broke laws that had been overwritten by the Patriot Act' ... then i guess it wouldn't matter, just like most old laws not in use anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>I dislike Bush and Cheney even more &#8230; But let us be honest for a minute.</p>
<p>Since the U.S. Patriot Act was signed into law the Bush administration has done nothing that was illegal that anyone is aware of or something would already be being done about it by the Democrats, just like everything the Democrats are doing is legal or the Republicans would be all over it - not just radio entertainers from both big top tents.</p>
<p>They may have twisted, miscommunicated, only showed half the information, only released what they wished people to believe, refused to cooperate in a bipartisan manner, not done some things in a proper manner and possibly even been flat out ****** to anyone not in their little group but, they have not broken any law since the Patriot Act was signed.</p>
<p>*Unless it is meant &#8216;broke laws that had been overwritten by the Patriot Act&#8217; &#8230; then i guess it wouldn&#8217;t matter, just like most old laws not in use anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What has the Bush administration done that is actually criminal? by Bel-Air</title>
		<link>http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Bel-Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datafindersusa.com/what-has-the-bush-administration-done-that-is-actually-criminal/331/#comment-524</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


Wiretapping without obtaining approval from the "F.I.S.A court IS ILLEGAL!!!  It was made so after watergate and Micah T; You had better read the US constitution. Privacy IS a constitutional right; it is in the 4th amendment of the Bill of Rights!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=""></a></p>
<p>Wiretapping without obtaining approval from the &#8220;F.I.S.A court IS ILLEGAL!!!  It was made so after watergate and Micah T; You had better read the US constitution. Privacy IS a constitutional right; it is in the 4th amendment of the Bill of Rights!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
